
|
|
Education, Work, and Life Chances |
 |
|
Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Labour market and welfare state.
The social protection of labour market risks over the life course –
Risk management through transitional labour markets |
|
|
| |
The restructuring of the interface between the labour market and the welfare
state is now regarded as an essential prerequisite for the resolution of the
persistent or constantly impending employment crisis in Europe. While the
projects in the other research areas investigate individual aspects of this
major issue, the theoretical and empirical approach adopted in this area is an
holistic one. The unit’s argument is that the regulative notion of transitional
labour markets is an academically fruitful approach to the problem of
operationalising the still somewhat vague notions of the ‘activating’ welfare
state, the ‘social investment state’ and ‘preventive’ or ‘proactive’ labour
market policy in order that they can be applied to the labour market. The notion
of risk management through transitional labour markets is based on the
assumption that the risk of long-term unemployment, which can be a major
catastrophe for individuals, the economy and society at large, can be largely
avoided by putting in place measures to protect against the risks that typically
arise in the course of the working life. These risk include the wrong choice of
occupation, the obsolescence of skills and qualifications, changes in
occupational preferences, fluctuating demand for labour, changes in employment
preferences or working time, dismissal or redundancy, starting a family or other
changes in personal circumstances (divorce or partner’s move) and chronic
illness or reduced efficiency because of handicap and/or age. These risks are
not new, but are occurring more frequently and many economically active
individuals are increasingly being exposed to an accumulation of risks. This
raises a certain number of questions. What adjustment processes can be observed
in the labour market policies being pursued in the various European employment
systems? Are the trends converging or diverging? Can ‘good practices’ be
identified? Are they transferable? What are the (political and economic)
determinants of a successful reform programme? At the same time, however, a
number of unresolved fundamental questions concerning theory formation in the
social sciences, the development of a complex theory of governance, particularly
in the context of the still undeveloped notion of risk management, and the
appropriate methodological design for the comparative evaluation of transitional
processes and the corresponding processes of reform in labour market policy are
also to be addressed.
v The tackling of youth unemplyoment and
the European Employment Strategy. A Story of Success?
v Economic and social risks and
institutions on artistic labour markets
v Planned projects
|
|
 |
 |
| |
● The tackling of youth unemplyoment and the European
Employment Strategy. A Story of Success? Dissertation project:
Christian Brzinsky-Fay
Young people are facing increasing problems during their transition between
initial education and working life. First, in times of persisting unemployment
the chance to find a reasonable and stable job are low in general. Second,
because of labour market asymmetries, like lack of information or lower
productivity, young people are by definition in a disadvantaged starting
position. Third, the transitions from school to work become more complex and
prolonged in most European countries.
These problems of young people vary strongly across countries, which not only
can be shown by very different levels of youth unemployment. The differences are
not only depending on the general economic situation, but above all on the
particular institutional setting. In this context, the dual system often is
taken as a shining example for integrating a very high share of young people
into the labour market in a sustainable way. However, in terms of social
exclusion the performance of the dual system seems to be worse, which makes
"repairing policies" even in this case necessary.
Active labour market policies in general are strongly connected to both,
institutional setting and empirical outcomes (transitions, risks) on the youth
labour market. In other words: youth policies modify outcomes of educational
respectively training institutions. To analyse the effects of youth transition
regimes it is necessary to look at the interaction of policies and institutions.
Here we have a fundamental gap in research.
In this context the main questions are:
• How strong are policies determined by institutional settings?
• What makes a policy transferable to other institutions?
Youth unemployment has played a significant role from the very beginning of
the Luxemburg process, although its weight was considerably reduced in the 2003
guidelines. However, it can be assumed that youth policies in some countries at
least were induced by the European level.
Here the following questions should be answered:
• On the national level, are there changes in policy making observable?
• If so, can these changes be traced to the European Employment Strategy? In
other words: Can you talk of policy learning and/or policy transfer
within the EU?
• Did interventions or reforms affect only policies or even institutions?
• Are there processes of convergence respectively divergence observable?
Policies on the member states level regarding youth labour market usually
include a couple of actors. In the field of initial vocational education social
partners play an important role. For example, the dual system in Germany is
based on very formalised agreements of employers, trade unions and the state,
and is, therefore, an paradigm for transitional labour markets. Nevertheless,
the discussion about the future of the dual system is focused on the fact that
firms do not offer enough training places to young people, which puts attention
to the demand side of the youth labour market.
• Are there (successful) policies to motivate firms to offer more
training places?
• If not, how could it be managed to fit the interests of firms in different
employment regimes?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| |
● Economic and social risks and
institutions on artistic labour markets Dissertation project:
Carroll Haak
Related WZB Discussion Papers Carroll Haak:
Von Künstlern lernen: Mehrfachbeschäftigung, Bildung und Einkommen
auf den Arbeitsmärkten von Künstlern
SP I 2006 – 123
> Abstract –
>PDF
Carroll Haak:
Künstler zwischen selbständiger und abhängiger Erwerbsarbeit
SP I 2005 – 107 > Abstract
>PDF
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| |
Planned projects Work in
society: multiple blueprints for the future
Book project (planned): Eckart Hildebrandt
Various trends in the development of paid work associated with technological
advance, the increased importance of knowledge work, globalisation and the
diffusion of information technologies have led to the relativisation of societal
models and the erosion of institutions and norms. Attempts are to be made to
systematise this discourse and to test the plausibility of various blueprints
for the future. The aim is to develop an ‘extended concept of work’ that builds
on the notion of sustainability, that is it includes aspects such as the
capacity of work to offer meaningful activity, a means of self-support and
participation in the wider society. Various international developments, the
dynamics of informal work and the question of general basic rights to work will
also be examined.
Managing Social Risks Through Transitional Labour Markets (tlm.excel)
Project management (possibly): Günther Schmid,
Klaus Schömann (IU Bremen)
Building on the “tlm.net” thematic network, we plan possibly a comprehensive
research network TLM.EXCEL under the 6th framework programme. Our aim is to
contribute to the modernisation of the European social model. Based on the
concept of transitional labour markets we set out to explore options for the
development of the European social model through the comparative analysis of
welfare regimes and the local, regional, national and European potential for
social innovations recognising path-dependency on each of these levels. We want
to search for innovative solutions to the new social risks that derive from the
transition to the knowledge society as the pool of vulnerable people in a
society changes. We try also to understand why policy learning in the field of
social policies has been slow so far in the European Union. Indicators of social
dynamics in the form of transitions within and between transitional labour
markets have been developed, but the comparability across countries and the
consequences for designing new institutional arrangements, especially in terms
of employment or work-life-insurance needs to be improved. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|