
|
|
Completed research programs |
 |
|
Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transnational City Networks in Europe |
|
|
|
v Focus of research
v Members of the Working Group
v Publications
¬ City
Network: Climate Alliance 1992-2003 |
|
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
Focus of research |
|
|
The decreasing capacity of individual nation states to act
effectively has caused a change in the nature of European political
institutions. This change is both a reflection of the
impending loss of control at national level, as well as an attempt
to counteract this apparent deficit. The transnational city networks
project, started in 2000/2001, examines the new forms of governance
that have emerged beyond the concept of the nation state. The
project focuses on the structure and function of transnational city
networks in Europe; it looks for the reasons underlying the
emergence of specific network organizations and it assesses their
problem-solving capacities. Do transnational city networks represent
a real alternative to other forms of governance? What significance
do they have for policy learning? In what relationship do they stand
to national-level institutions? What role does the European Union (EU)
play in the building up of such networks?
Transnational city networks are a relatively new phenomenon in
Europe. Most of them have emerged since the 1980s and they are
distinctly different from the traditional forms of interest
representation of local authorities in the EU. Members of the
networks are the cities themselves and not national associations.
Examples of such networks are the Union of the Baltic Cities,
comprising over 100 cities in the Baltic Region, the Alliance in the
Alps (Allianz in den Alpen), comprising approximately 140
communities throughout the Alpine Region, and the Eurocities
network, comprising over 100 cities with more than 250,000
inhabitants in 26 European countries. Characteristic of such
networks is, first, autonomy of their member cities who may join or
leave the group at their own discretion; second, as a rule, the
networks are polycentric, horizontal, and not hierarchical; third,
these networks form the basis for decentralized cooperation among
their member cities. This project investigates, principally,
transnational city networks, because they exhibit high degrees of
institutionalization and internal differentiation. In addition,
meta-networks are examined because of their particular significance
for the study.
The starting point of analysis is the examination of three parallel
tendencies. First of all, tasks are already increasingly (re)assigned
to existing international and supranational institutions. In
addition, scores of new European-level and international-level
institutions have sprung up in recent years, among which
transnational city networks must be counted. Second, sub-national
level entities like regions and cities, in conjunction with new
governance forms that go beyond the nation-state concept, have taken
on increasing significance. In recent years many European countries
have exercised devolution of authority and strengthened local-level
capacities. Third, many tasks heretofore falling under the authority
of national governments have been transferred from state
institutions to non-governmental organizations (NGOs), private
institutions, and transnational city networks. National authority
has therefore diffused in three directions: upwards to transnational
and supranational organizations, laterally to NGOs and other
non-state organizations, and downwards to sub-national actors. The
institutionalization of transnational networks of cities and local
authorities in Europe mirrors this development in all three
directions. Through the emergence of transnational city networks,
institutional arrangements shift to European or international level.
Tangential to this run local level developments: the transnational
networking of cities thus connects the local level directly to the
global level ("glocal governance"). Finally, the processes of change
are evidenced on the national level because transnational city
networks cooperate increasingly with national-level institutions on
joint projects. This project focuses on four main issues that
concern the "internal governance" as well as "external relations" of
transnational networks. |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
| |
1. Governance and performance of transnational city networks |
|
|
Transnational city networks have their own resources: that is, as a
rule, they have their own office staffed with their own personnel,
funded from their own financial assets. Membership in the network is
formal: the members support the organization with membership fees;
the organization can make decisions that are binding for all
members. Considering this, the question can be raised as to what
functional equivalents to the sanction mechanisms of hierarchical
organizations have been developed within such networks.
Increasingly, competition and benchmarking strategies have become
decisive for the performance of networks. Many networks follow a
definite chronological sequence of development for gauging
performance: first, they build up databases on "best practice";
following that, they hold quality competitions; finally, they
establish indicators which permit the systematic comparison of
performance of the individual member cities. |
|
|
2. Competition and cooperation between transnational city networks |
|
|
A further characteristic of transnational city networks is the
competition and cooperation between the different networks.
Transnational city networks compete for members as well as for
resources. The dynamics of these networks depends upon the
strategies their organizations choose to follow. They may opt
between growth strategies (obtaining as many members as possible)
and stabilization strategies (obtaining a definite number of members
and keeping this number constant or near constant). Cooperation
among and coordination of networks is often steered via
meta-networks. For instance, the European Sustainable Cities & Towns
Campaign (ESCTC), to which some 1300 European cities, local
authorities and regions already belong, became the focal point for
cooperation and coordination with 10 European and international city
networks. The ESCTC thus represents a new form of European network
governance and acts as a kind of umbrella organization for the
European and international city networks with which it deals. |
|
|
3. Nation-state institutions and transnational city networks |
|
|
Transnational city networks transgress national borders. This does
not mean, however, that national factors have become meaningless. To
the contrary, national concerns and dynamics affect transnational
city networks; here the type of relationship to the national
structures and the form of transnational governance are decisive for
the networks. Networks like the International Council on Local
Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) can opt for several different
paths: for instance, they may try to involve already existing
national-level associations of cities, or they may create
national-level coordinating bodies like the Climate Alliance (Klima-Bündnis).
In some cases, the growth of a transnational network can be
accelerated as a result of national programs that selectively target
its members. The Alliance in the Alps is one such example.
Nation-states thus contribute to the creation of a
transnational-level that is essentially beyond their own control.
Nevertheless, the build-up of national-level support
structures, especially for small communities, has been of decisive
importance for the success of the transnational city networks. In
general, the larger cities form the bulk of the active membership in
the transnational city networks, whereas smaller cities and local
authorities are overwhelmingly oriented towards national-level
structures. |
|
|
4. European governance and transnational city networks |
|
|
Finally there is the question of interdependencies between the city
networks, the nation-states and the EU. Developments up to now have
clearly shown that the "transnationalization" of city politics and
policies has often been influenced, if not initiated, by the EU.
Particularly favorable to transnational network development have
been those EU initiatives that aim for stronger decentralization of
policy, that promote the integration of the civil society into the
decision-making processes, and that aim to improve direct
relationships to existing city networks. The European Commission
does not limit itself, however, to already existing structures when
it devises its programs; rather, it functions as a network builder,
spinning the twines between the nodes. The EU promotes cooperation
among the networks, especially through the creation of and lending
institutional support to meta-networks. Further, the observable
tendency among many countries to shift governmental and social tasks
from the national level to local or regional levels has had
significant impact on network development. In addition, the direct
connection between the EU and the cities not only bypasses the route
from national to EU level, it also indirectly influences and can
even change the hierarchical relationship between the nation-states
and their cities. Thus, there is indeed strong evidence that a new
model of European governance has emerged.
Transnational city networks are just one example for new, "glocal"
governance forms beyond the concept of the nation-state. The
transnational city networks project serves to provide a more exact
analysis of internal and external factors influencing such networks,
that is, to show how such explanatory factors determine the performance of transnational network
organizations. Beyond that, the project will analyze the state of
tension between transnational and national forms of governance: the
spectrum here ranges from the re-nationalization of transnational
networks to the transnationalization of national-level programs.
Finally, the project is concerned with a widely neglected phenomenon
that appears to be growing in significance, namely, the
establishment of a new model of European governance. |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
| |
Members of the Working Group |
|
|
> Kristine Kern
> Stefan Niederhafner |
|
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
Publications |
|
| |
Kern, Kristine und Tina Löffelsend 2004: Sustainable Development in
the Baltic Sea Region. Governance Beyond the Nation State, Local
Environment 9 (2004) (in print).
Kern, Kristine 2003: Vereint macht stark. Noch ist der Einfluss der
Städte und Gemeinden im EU-System nicht groß. Aber kommunale
Kooperationen über die Grenzen hinweg sind die Basis für
Veränderungen, in:
>PRO POLIS 21, Mai 2003, S. 11.
Bulkeley Harriet, Anna Davies, Bob Evans, David Gibbs, Kristine Kern
und Kate Theobald 2003: Environmental Governance and Transnational
Municipal Networks in Europe, Journal of Environmental Policy &
Planning 5(3): 235-254.
Dorsch, Pamela 2003: Nationale und transnationale Vernetzung
polnischer Städte und Regionen. Auf dem Weg zu einer nachhaltigen
Stadt und Regionalentwicklung, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin
für Sozialforschung, Discussion Paper SP IV 2003-106, 89 S.
Behringer, Jeannette 2003: Nationale und transnationale
Städtenetzwerke in der Alpenregion, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum
Berlin für Sozialforschung, Discussion Paper SP IV 2003-104, 49 S.
Kern, Kristine 2002: Diffusion nachhaltiger Politikmuster,
transnationale Netzwerke und "glokale" Governance, in: Karl-Werner
Brand (Hrsg.), Politik der Nachhaltigkeit. Voraussetzungen, Probleme
und Chancen - eine kritische Diskussion, Berlin: edition sigma, S.
193-210.
Kern, Kristine und Alexander Wegener 2002: Institutionelle
Innovationen deutscher Kommunen zwischen lokaler und europäischer
Governance, in: Jens Libbe, Stephan Tomerius und Jan Trapp (Hrsg.),
Liberalisierung und Privatisierung kommunaler Aufgabenerfüllung.
Soziale und umweltpolitische Perspektiven im Zeichen des Wettbewerbs,
Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik (Difu-Beiträge zur
Stadtforschung 37), S. 221-238.
Kern, Kristine 2001: Transnationale Städtenetzwerke in Europa, in:
Eckhard Schröter (Hrsg.), Empirische Policy- und
Verwaltungsforschung. Lokale, nationale und internationale
Perspektiven, Opladen: Leske + Budrich, S. 95-116.
Kern, Kristine 2001: Transnational City Networking in Europe, Paper
Prepared for the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of
Global Environmental Change "Global Environmental Change and the
Nation State", Berlin, 7-8 December 2001. |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Last change: 2005-03-22 13:36 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|