
|
|
Completed research programs |
 |
|
Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
WZB Discussion Paper Abstracts |
|
|
|
|
1997 |
|
| |
v
2005
I
2004
I
2003
I
2002
I
2001
I
2000
I
1999
I
1998
I 1997
I
1996
I
1995
I
1994
I
1993
I
1992
|
|
|
The different research units of the WZB
publish their reports in "Discussion papers" (DIN A4-format).
They are available from the WZB's
Press and
Information Office. Please order the Discussion Papers by
email or
mail and include the number (SP IV …) and title of the
Discussion Paper in your order form . (Only written orders are
accepted.)
Delivery Terms
The WZB also offers the complete text of a number of discussion
papers for downloading in portable document format (PDF).
(Documents available in PDF are indicated by the Adobe PDF symbol to
the left of the title just under the paper number.) You
can view PDF documents with the original formatting on your screen
as well as print them out. To do so, you need
¬Adobe's free "Acrobat Reader" software. Be sure to use version
4 or higher of Acrobat Reader, as our documents are not readable
with older versions. |
|
 |
| |
 |
 |
|
FS
II 97-301
|
Helmut
Weidner (ed.): Performance
and Characteristics of German Environmental Policy. Overview
and Expert Commentaries from 14 Countries. 80 S. |
|
English
Abstract: |
For over 25 years, Germany has
been pursuing a modern environmental policy with some unique
institutional and legal features. Compared internationally,
it can be credited with some notable successes, although these
have come at great financial and bureaucratic cost. During
the 1990s, as a consequence of the serious deterioration in
the economic situation, pressure on environmental policy from
the business sector has been growing: demands include deregulation,
privatisation and that Germany no longer 'goes it alone'.
Environmental organisations and independent experts fear that
the present government is doing too much to accommodate these
critics, and that environmental capacity generated to date
is thereby being harmed, in particular through the removal
of participation and intervention opportunities for individuals
and environmental organisations, as well as through cuts in
funding for environmental bodies and research. On the other
hand, as the 'technocratic approach' (curative & end-of-pipe
measures) ever more clearly reaches the limits of its effectiveness
and now that a broad consensus on the importance of working
towards sustainable development has been reached, the volume
and complexity of the work facing environmental policy have
greatly increased. What is therefore required is increased
environmental policy. This is the tense situation in which
German environmental policy finds itself today. The coming
years will show whether, as the writer believes, this is nothing
more than a marked but temporary slowing-down of the environmental
policy dynamic, or a serious reversal, as is the opinion of
some of the experts who were asked to comment on German environmental
policy, and whose commentaries are printed here. This discussion
paper starts with a brief sketch of the development of German
environmental policy. There then follows a description of
some of its deficits, on the basis of commentaries (analysis
and criticism) by environmental experts from 14 countries,
including Germany. In particular, as a result of the numerous
critical observations on the performance of German environmental
policy, the authors earlier assertion as to its leading position
in the international field is considerably qualified. Afterwards,
the author brings out some general aspects which play a part
in the environmental policy of many countries, and which are
made clear by the commentaries. In conclusion come the expert
commentaries themselves. In many cases, the reader will gain
thereby a deeper insight into the central problem areas in
the environmental politics of the various countries. In the
appendix can be found brief information on the position, main
research ares and current environmental publications of the
experts. (Author's abstract)
|
|
|
FS
II 97-302
|
Wolfgang
van den Daele, Alfred Pühler, Herbert Sukopp (ed.): Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Crops. A Participatory Technology
Assessment. Summary Report. 106 S. |
|
English
Abstract: |
This
report summarises a participatory technology assessment on transgenic
herbicide-resistant crops organised by the Research Unit, Standard
Setting and the Environment, at the Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin,
between 1991 and 1993. The technology assessment was a 'round
table' involving some fifty representatives from industry, environmental
groups, regulatory agencies and science in more than ten days
of controversial debate and analysis. The first part of this
summary report describes the methodology used applied in analysing
the deliberations of the technology assessmentthe second part
presents the empirical findings with respect to the performance,
the risks and the benefits of transgenic herbicide-resistant
cropsthe third part gives an account of the ethical, legal and
political discussions held in the technology assessment, as
well as the recommendations for regulation advanced by the participants.
(Author's abstract) |
|
 |
FS
II 97-303
|
Katharina
Holzinger, Helmut Weidner: Das Neusser Mediationsverfahren im politischen Umfeld. Schriften
zu Mediationsverfahren im Umweltschutz Nr. 17. 45 S. |
|
English
Abstract: |
In a
research project partially supported by the German Federal Ministry
for Education, Science, Research and Technology (BMBF) from
1991 to 1994, a multidisciplinary research group from the section
'Standard Setting and Environment' of the Science Center Berlin
for Social Research (WZB) analyzed a series of domestic and
foreign environmental mediation cases. The main object of the
research was the mediation procedure over the waste management
concept for the district of Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, in
Germany. In this paper, the authors present the results of an
oral survey. Before, during, and after the procedure, 93 qualitative
interviews were conducted with participants in the mediation
and other relevant actor groups. The aim of this survey was
in part to obtain additional information to better understand
what went on in Neuss in terms of conflict history, conflict
constellation, the political processes surrounding the Neuss
mediation, and further political developments following this
event. The survey data also cover research questions exploring
the relationship between mediation procedures and their political-institutional
environments. In particular, the authors consider the concept
of participation, the role of the media, feedback processes
between participants in a mediation and the organizations or
businesses they represent, and changes in the network structure.
|
|
|
FS
II 97-304
|
Katharina
Holzinger: Evaluating Environmental
Mediation. Mediation in the Waste Management Programme of the
District Authority in Neuss, Germany. Results of a Participant
Survey. Schriften zu Mediationsverfahren im Umweltschutz Nr. 18.
30 S. |
|
English
Abstract: |
Little
empirically based social scientific research has been carried
out with the aim of evaluating mediation procedures. Generally,
such procedures are evaluated retrospectively and on the basis
of very general criteria (Was an agreement achieved?). The Social
Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) is conducting a research
project into mediation procedures in the field of environmental
protection, the central object of study being the mediation
procedure undertaken to resolve the dispute over the waste management
programme of Neuss County in Germany. This paper presents some
results of the accompanying social scientific research, with
the aim of evaluating the success of the mediation. It begins
by describing the problems underlying the mediation procedure
in Neuss, the procedure itself and the results achieved. There
then follows an evaluation of this procedure, based on 18 key
procedural and results-related criteria for evaluating the success
of the mediation. The analysis shows that the evaluation of
mediation procedures is a highly complex affair, and that this
is reflected in the evaluations made by the participants themselves. |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Last change: 2005-03-22 13:36 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|