Home Home Contact Us Sitemap Search Masthead Deutsch
Completed research programsCivil Society and Transnational Networks

Completed research programs

Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks





WZB Discussion Paper Abstracts



  1997  
  v 2005 I 2004 I 2003 I 2002 I 2001 I 2000 I 1999 I 1998 I 1997 I 1996 I 1995 I 1994 I 1993 I 1992  

The different research units of the WZB publish their reports in "Discussion papers" (DIN A4-format). They are available from  the WZB's Press and Information Office. Please order the Discussion Papers by email or mail and include the number (SP IV ) and title of the Discussion Paper in your order form . (Only written orders are accepted.)


Delivery Terms

The WZB also offers the complete text of a number of discussion papers for downloading in portable document format (PDF).  (Documents available in PDF are indicated by the Adobe PDF symbol to the left of the title just under the paper number.) You can view PDF documents with the original formatting on your screen as well as print them out. To do so, you need ¬Adobe's free "Acrobat Reader" software. Be sure to use version 4 or higher of Acrobat Reader, as our documents are not readable with older versions.

 

 FS II 97-301
Helmut Weidner (ed.): Performance and Characteristics of German Environmental Policy. Overview and Expert Commentaries from 14 Countries. 80 S.
English Abstract:

For over 25 years, Germany has been pursuing a modern environmental policy with some unique institutional and legal features. Compared internationally, it can be credited with some notable successes, although these have come at great financial and bureaucratic cost. During the 1990s, as a consequence of the serious deterioration in the economic situation, pressure on environmental policy from the business sector has been growing: demands include deregulation, privatisation and that Germany no longer 'goes it alone'. Environmental organisations and independent experts fear that the present government is doing too much to accommodate these critics, and that environmental capacity generated to date is thereby being harmed, in particular through the removal of participation and intervention opportunities for individuals and environmental organisations, as well as through cuts in funding for environmental bodies and research. On the other hand, as the 'technocratic approach' (curative & end-of-pipe measures) ever more clearly reaches the limits of its effectiveness and now that a broad consensus on the importance of working towards sustainable development has been reached, the volume and complexity of the work facing environmental policy have greatly increased. What is therefore required is increased environmental policy. This is the tense situation in which German environmental policy finds itself today. The coming years will show whether, as the writer believes, this is nothing more than a marked but temporary slowing-down of the environmental policy dynamic, or a serious reversal, as is the opinion of some of the experts who were asked to comment on German environmental policy, and whose commentaries are printed here. This discussion paper starts with a brief sketch of the development of German environmental policy. There then follows a description of some of its deficits, on the basis of commentaries (analysis and criticism) by environmental experts from 14 countries, including Germany. In particular, as a result of the numerous critical observations on the performance of German environmental policy, the authors earlier assertion as to its leading position in the international field is considerably qualified. Afterwards, the author brings out some general aspects which play a part in the environmental policy of many countries, and which are made clear by the commentaries. In conclusion come the expert commentaries themselves. In many cases, the reader will gain thereby a deeper insight into the central problem areas in the environmental politics of the various countries. In the appendix can be found brief information on the position, main research ares and current environmental publications of the experts. (Author's abstract)

 FS II 97-302
Wolfgang van den Daele, Alfred Pühler, Herbert Sukopp (ed.): Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Crops. A Participatory Technology Assessment. Summary Report. 106 S.
English Abstract: This report summarises a participatory technology assessment on transgenic herbicide-resistant crops organised by the Research Unit, Standard Setting and the Environment, at the Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, between 1991 and 1993. The technology assessment was a 'round table' involving some fifty representatives from industry, environmental groups, regulatory agencies and science in more than ten days of controversial debate and analysis. The first part of this summary report describes the methodology used applied in analysing the deliberations of the technology assessmentthe second part presents the empirical findings with respect to the performance, the risks and the benefits of transgenic herbicide-resistant cropsthe third part gives an account of the ethical, legal and political discussions held in the technology assessment, as well as the recommendations for regulation advanced by the participants. (Author's abstract)

Go to top

 FS II 97-303
Katharina Holzinger, Helmut Weidner: Das Neusser Mediationsverfahren im politischen Umfeld. Schriften zu Mediationsverfahren im Umweltschutz Nr. 17. 45 S.
English Abstract: In a research project partially supported by the German Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology (BMBF) from 1991 to 1994, a multidisciplinary research group from the section 'Standard Setting and Environment' of the Science Center Berlin for Social Research (WZB) analyzed a series of domestic and foreign environmental mediation cases. The main object of the research was the mediation procedure over the waste management concept for the district of Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, in Germany. In this paper, the authors present the results of an oral survey. Before, during, and after the procedure, 93 qualitative interviews were conducted with participants in the mediation and other relevant actor groups. The aim of this survey was in part to obtain additional information to better understand what went on in Neuss in terms of conflict history, conflict constellation, the political processes surrounding the Neuss mediation, and further political developments following this event. The survey data also cover research questions exploring the relationship between mediation procedures and their political-institutional environments. In particular, the authors consider the concept of participation, the role of the media, feedback processes between participants in a mediation and the organizations or businesses they represent, and changes in the network structure.
 FS II 97-304
Katharina Holzinger: Evaluating Environmental Mediation. Mediation in the Waste Management Programme of the District Authority in Neuss, Germany. Results of a Participant Survey. Schriften zu Mediationsverfahren im Umweltschutz Nr. 18. 30 S.
English Abstract: Little empirically based social scientific research has been carried out with the aim of evaluating mediation procedures. Generally, such procedures are evaluated retrospectively and on the basis of very general criteria (Was an agreement achieved?). The Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) is conducting a research project into mediation procedures in the field of environmental protection, the central object of study being the mediation procedure undertaken to resolve the dispute over the waste management programme of Neuss County in Germany. This paper presents some results of the accompanying social scientific research, with the aim of evaluating the success of the mediation. It begins by describing the problems underlying the mediation procedure in Neuss, the procedure itself and the results achieved. There then follows an evaluation of this procedure, based on 18 key procedural and results-related criteria for evaluating the success of the mediation. The analysis shows that the evaluation of mediation procedures is a highly complex affair, and that this is reflected in the evaluations made by the participants themselves.
 

Go to top 

Last change: 2005-03-22 13:36